Europe, an allegory for the ages of man

April 26, 2011

You are born Italian: they are relentlessly infantile and mother obsessed. In childhood you are English, chronically shy, tongue-tied, cliquey and only happy kicking balls, pulling the legs off things or sending people to Coventry. Teenagers are French: pretentiously philosophical, emabarrasingly vain, ridiculously romantic and insincere. During middle age we become either Swiss or Irish. Old age is German: pompous, pondering and pedantic. And finally we regress into being Belgian, with no idea of who we are at all.

A.A.Gill, The Spectator


RICHARD BRANSON ON BRANDING

April 16, 2011
Cover of "Business Stripped Bare: Adventu...

The founder of the Virgin empire talks about the Virgin brand and shares advice on defining your business image.

The conventional wisdom at business school is stick with what you know. Of the top 20 brands in the world, 19 ply a well-defined trade. Coca-Cola specializes in soft drinks, Microsoft in computers, Nike in sports shoes and gear.

The exception in this list is Virgin — and the fact that we’re worth several billion dollars really bothers people who believe that they know “the rules of business” (whatever they are).

We’re the only one of the top 20 that has diversified into a range of business activities, including airlines, trains, vacations, mobile phones, media, the Internet, financial services and health care.

We have created more billion-dollar companies in more sectors than any other company.

Between 2000 and 2003, Virgin created three new billion-dollar companies from scratch, in three different countries. Virgin Blue in Australia took 35 percent of the aviation market and reduced fares dramatically. Virgin Mobile became Britain’s fastest growing network. Virgin Mobile in the United States was the country’s fastest growing company ever, private or public.

As a result of this diversification, Virgin has been able to weather the storm of the recession. Our risks are spread over many companies, industries and countries; the failure of one will not bring down the whole group.

Why, then, are business teachers telling young entrepreneurs to stick to what they know, rather than advising them to imitate a company like Virgin? Because they should.

The Virgin brand came into existence gradually, reflecting what I was fundamentally interested in. And to my own surprise, it wasn’t publishing magazines, as I’d originally thought; it wasn’t even music. My driving force, I realize now, was finding new ways to help people have a good time — ideally, in places where they were least expecting it. Like airports.

Contrary to appearances, Virgin is focused: Our customers and investors relate to us more as an idea or philosophy than as a company. We offer the Virgin experience, and make sure it is consistent across all sectors. It’s all about the brand.

If you are embarking on a new venture, how should you envision and develop your brand? Let’s start with what a brand does.

Brands exist as a means of communicating what to expect from a product or service. The Virgin brand tells you that using this credit card is rather like using this airline, which, in turn, is rather like using this health club, staying in our hotels, and paying into this pension fund. It is a guarantee you’ll be treated well, get a high-quality product that won’t dent your bank balance, and get more fun out of your purchase than you expected.

Should you follow the Virgin formula and focus your new company on providing a certain customer experience? It really depends on the type of business you are in. We are in consumer-facing sectors where service is key. You need to assess what is core to yours.

When creating your first ads, designing a logo and reaching out to potential customers for the first time, you may be tempted to create a brand that’s very corporate and remote. Too many companies want their brands to reflect some idealized, perfected image of themselves. As a consequence, their brands acquire no texture, no character and no public trust.

In contrast, Virgin wears its sense of humor on its sleeve.

It’s about our wanting to be honest about the ups and downs of our business and share what we think with the people who matter most — our customers. The people who see our ads are the same people who read about our tussles, setbacks and mistakes. So why would we pretend the real world doesn’t affect us?

Almost everybody in Britain knows of our run-ins with British Airways over the years. We had a lot of fun when we introduced onboard massages on Virgin Atlantic, running an advertisement in the newspapers saying “British Airways doesn’t give a shiatsu!”

Whatever you and your team decide your new brand will stand for, deliver on that promise. That’s the only way you’ll ever control your brand. And beware: brands always mean something. If you don’t define what the brand means, your competitors will. Apple’s ads contrasting a fit, happy, creative Mac with a fat, glum, nerdy PC tell you all you need to know about how that works.

So, what’s next? For any business building a consumer brand, speaking to journalists is part of the deal. Be prepared! Know what you stand for and be certain you’re delivering it. Then you’ll be able to answer every question openly and frankly, building your relationships with your customers and the media.

This is an edited excerpt from Richard Branson’s book Business Stripped Bare: Adventures of a Global Entrepreneur (Virgin Books, 2010).
Enhanced by Zemanta

I see Earth. It’s so beautiful!

April 12, 2011

With these words the modern age was ushered in 50 years ago today.

On April 12, 1961, a 27-year-old Russian cosmonaut climbed into a small metal capsule, the Vostok 1, and slipped free of the Earth’s gravitational bonds into what we simply call “space.”

From his precarious cockpit Yuri Gagarin looked down and, like the Star Child in 2001: A Space Odyssey, he saw for the first time ever our Earthly sphere in all its ethereal completeness.

“I see Earth. It’s so beautiful!” he said.

The spacecraft completed one orbit around the globe, lasting about 1 hour and 48 minutes. Cosmonaut Gagarin’s flight astonished the world.

Our sense of who we are and what was possible changed forever.

Six weeks later, on May 25th, 1961, President Kennedy threw down the gauntlet in a special address to Congress.

“I believe that this nation should commit itself to achieving the goal, before this decade is out, of landing a man on the Moon and returning him safely to the Earth.”

We did. And what have we since learned? Be astonished again.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Microsoft Guy Vs. Apple Guy

April 4, 2011

Who’s got the coolest expert?

A fascinating dispute is unfolding between Apple, which claims the right to the trade name ‘App Store’, Microsoft, which says ‘app store’ is generic, and the expert linguists they have hired to present their respective cases.

Microsoft filed its latest argument with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office backed with the opinions of linguist Ronald Butters, who supports the software giant’s argument that the term “app store” was generic and shouldn’t be trademarked by Apple.

Microsoft hired Dr. Butters to counter Apple’s own linguistic expert, Robert Leonard, who asserted that the electronics giant’s “App Store” was a proper noun and deserved to be trademarked, even though the words are generic when separated.

Whatever the finer linguistic points of either case in this intriguing tussle over words and names, it is remarkable how Messrs. Butters and Leonard seem to be ideally suited to the brands they represent.

For Microsoft, we have the worthy Dr. Butters, Professor Emeritus, English & Cultural Anthropology, at Duke University.

For Apple, we have Robert Leonard, a longtime Hofstra University linguistics professor. Oh, and he’s a founder member of Sha Na Na, the 1960s rock n’ roll group.

Apart from helping to track down a serial killer and training FBI and international agents in forensic linguistic techniques, Mr. Leonard sang bass, wearing gold lamé and a pompadour hairdo, for Sha Na Na when they opened for Jimi Hendrix at Woodstock in 1969.

Did I mention Dr. Butters is Professor Emeritus, English & Cultural Anthropology, at Duke University?

An early encounter with a naming problem may have nudged Mr. Leonard towards his current distinguished career.

The group began singing as part of an a capella group, The Kingsmen, at Columbia University in the 1960s. Another group with the same name hit pay dirt in 1963 with the song “Louie, Louie”. So Robert Leonard and Co decided a new, more distinctive name was in order. Sha Na Na was born.

Sha Na Na came from a line in the hit song “Get A Job,” performed by the Silhouettes (watch them here) in 1957. You know the words:

Sha na na na, sha na na na na,
Yip yip yip yip yip yip yip yip
Mum mum mum mum mum mum

Get a job, sha na na na, sha na na na na.

But back to the more mundane matter in hand – my non-trademark expert view is that while the term “app store” may be generic, many trademarks are combination of ordinary pieces.

As the Economist points out, The Container Store is a registered trademark, for example. You couldn’t start a “container store” under that name without expecting to hear from their lawyers.

I don’t know whether it has any bearing, but there is the ‘app’ word part from Apple’s name that might strengthen their case. Anyway, their expert is way cooler than Microsoft’s (no professional disrespect to Dr. Butters).

What do you think?  “App Store” or “app store”? Or should we all just get a job? Sha na na na, sha na na na na.

Enhanced by Zemanta

How the power of the Apple brand is reshaping entire industries

April 1, 2011

2011 will surely go down as the year Apple changed the face of the communications industry.

Wall Street Journal, April 1, 2011

In the space of just a few weeks, industry giants Nokia and T-Mobile have both crumpled under the Apple tsunami. Now Acer, the world’s No. 2 PC maker by shipments, is the latest to feel the pain.

Yesterday it was reported that Gianfranco Lanci, Acer’s CEO, resigned as part of the company’s efforts to reorganize its operations to tackle the rising challenge from Apple’s iPad.

The management change comes after Acer revised its first-quarter earnings forecast downward last week amid increasing concerns about sluggish demand for notebook PCs globally. The iPad is beginning to eat into the notebook and netbook markets, in which Acer has strong positions.

Three weeks ago AT&T announced its plan to acquire T-Mobile, the 4th largest wireless carrier in the United States. Most of the news focus was on AT&T and it’s need for spectrum and network quality to stem the dropped calls for which it has become notorious.

What had made T-Mobile so amenable to the merger was the advent of the iPhone.

The Game Changer

Customers weren’t having any problems with the T-Mobile network. The problem they had was that they wanted the iPhone and T-Mobile couldn’t offer it to them. So they left in droves.

T-Mobile’s reported a net loss of 318,000 customers in the last three months of 2010, which is more than twice as bad as the 117,000 customers lost during the same time period in 2009. It followed the 60,000 customers lost in Q3 2010.

T-Mobile failed to convince subscribers that it had a phone worthy of consideration over the iPhone and paid dearly for it. When Verizon started carrying the iPhone on February 11 the game was evidently over.

Coincidentally, on that same day, the CEO of cell phone giant Nokia announced a deal with Microsoft to use its Windows 7 software in an attempt to get back into a game it once dominated.

In a now famous “burning platform” memo to employees CEO Stephen Elop identified the cause of Nokia’s problem: Apple.

“The first iPhone shipped in 2007, and we still don’t have a product that is close to their experience. Android came on the scene just over 2 years ago, and this week they took our leadership position in smartphone volumes. Unbelievable.”

Nokia’s share price has fallen by two-thirds since then as it tried, unsuccessfully, to produce an iPhone killer. In the meantime, low-cost Chinese manufacturers, using Google’s Android software, have eaten into Nokia’s sales of basic handsets in emerging markets and are moving up the value chain quickly, commoditizing the entire industry in the process.

Where Nokia and Acer (and Motorola) see devices, Apple sees creative connections.

Apple has blurred the distinction between phones and computers, integrating them both into a mobile computing platform which is wrapped and delivered in the Apple brand experience.

The iPhone is a full-blown computer with touchscreen technology that turns the mobile Internet into a user-friendly experience. The apps that began appearing in 2008 enabled people to customize their iPhones to suit their lives.

It was the precursor of the iPad, which in itself has moved the game forward (as Acer would affirm). Both are natural expressions of the Apple brand ecosystem – form and function are seamlessly linked and forged into objects of desire. Expect to see news about Apple TV soon.

The power of the Apple brand is in its ability to create desire, to generate demand and to open new markets. Others can only follow, chasing market share with me-too products sold through low grade, third-party retail experiences.

Apple has already revolutionized the music industry with the iPod and iTunes store. One year ago the store served its 10 billionth song download; a milestone was reached in just under seven years of being online, making Apple the largest music retailer in the world.

This communications revolution is just beginning.

This video of Steve Jobs is always worth a view, if only as a reminder of the foundational philosophy behind the Apple brand.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 534 other followers